http://maryamnazari.com/%DA%86%DA%AF%D9%88%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%AA-%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%BE%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%84%E2%80%8C-%D8%A8%D9%86%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%85-%D8%AF/
Thesis at different stages of implementation challenges that I face with the help of God and my masters and friends Granqdr them dear, I was running successfully. 4 hypothesis of this study two preferences readers through semantic differentiation scale and the other two types of information retrieval as abstract research findings were confirmed by a case in connection with the readability of abstracts with two flash tools readability scale hypothesis was rejected, but readability Review of two types of readers comment on the findings obtained from the questionnaire was approved. Last hypothesis two types of information related to the quality of abstracts by the 25 criteria to review the check list was not approved. For more information and more accurate you can:
Files present session end ¬ defense letter (4.1 MB PDF)
File provided defense meeting ¬ end letter (4.1 MB PowerPoint)
Defense session audio files end ¬ Mstfa letter by my good friend Mr. Ahmadi and Ms. continent in the podcast ...
End Title page letter ¬
end letter
Text of thesis registration database Thesis
"MLIS" Thesis
Research Title
A Survey On structured abstracts in the Journal of Library and Documentation Center of Tehran University.
Supervisor:
N. Banieghbal, PhD
Consulting Supervisor:
A. Bozorgi, PhD
By:
Aboozar Ramezani
Summer 2009
A Survey On structured abstracts in the Journal of Library and Documentation Center of Tehran University.
Abstract
The aim of this survey is to compare
the structured abstracts of the articles of Journal of Librarianship Central
Library and Documentation Center University of Tehran with the unstructured
abstracts of the same articles of this journal.
This is an applied research which is done according to comparison method by the help of using three different tools:
a: Quality control checklist scale,
b: using Rudolph Flesch's Reading Ease Formula,
c: An online Questioner
The population of the research are two fold:
a: The structured abstracts published during 2007 to 2008 in Journal of Librarianship Central Library and Documentation Center University of Tehran and unstructured abstracts prepared and submitted by the writers of the same articles to their first drafts.
b: The academic members of the universities and their under graduate students.
The results show that readers of the structures abstracts believes that they are easily retrieval and their readability rate is higher.
At the end, preparing of structured abstract for the articles in scientific journals and the evolution of this kind of abstracts is proposed.
Keywords: Abstracting, Quality Abstract, Abstract Readability, Structured Abstracts, Comprehensiveness Abstract, Scientific Journal Articles.
ادامه مطلب ...<iframe src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/embeddedform?key=rO_Mu4M_D5D2IRu47UW59og" width="500" height="1615" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe>
sixth weeks of Notes for My processing of writing theses proposal
I had thouth for about my subject theses that I need hard working and studying. For this reason I prefer to writing a abstract and send to Adka Congress.
I trying to write abstract and programming for prepration research regarded knowledge dessimintion. By such as task of a lot of thinking and working for thesess.
The week of previous I was very glad my abstract accepted, because my master tell me this is improving my regard of seminar lesson.
Thank God